The War on Warriors: Behind the Betrayal of the Men Who Keep Us Free

“Twenty years…and the military I loved, I fought for, I revered…spit me out. While writing this book, I separated from an Army that didn’t want me anymore. The feeling was mutual—I didn’t want this Army anymore either.”

This statement encapsulates Hegseth’s disillusionment with the modern military, marking the emotional core of his argument. By presenting himself as a betrayed insider, Hegseth positions himself as both a critic and a whistleblower. The use of ellipses emphasizes the passage of time and his gradual separation from the institution he once revered, echoing his overarching critique of ideological shifts in military culture.

“The military is where our country needs—desperately—patriotic, faith-filled, and brave young Americans to step up and take the long view. At a basic level, do we really want only the woke ‘diverse’ recruits that the Biden administration is curating to be the ones with the guns and the guidons?”

This rhetorical question draws a stark contrast between Hegseth’s idealized vision of military service and the ideological changes he critiques. The phrase “faith-filled and brave” evokes traditionalist values, while the scare quotes around “diverse” signal his skepticism toward contemporary diversity initiatives. This statement encapsulates his core argument about the impact of ideological priorities on military readiness.

“While the post-9/11 generation of patriots spent two decades fighting enemies abroad, we allowed America’s domestic enemies at home to gobble up cultural, political, and spiritual territory.”

Here Hegseth introduces his dual-front war framework, contrasting the physical battles fought abroad with ideological battles lost at home. The metaphor “gobble up” portrays cultural change as an aggressive, predatory act, emphasizing the urgency of his argument. This framing underpins his broader theme of ideological threats undermining military and national identity.