Framed: Astonishing True Stories of Wrongful Convictions

Grisham and McCloskey explore the pervasive systemic flaws in the criminal justice system, exposing how entrenched inefficiencies and human biases contribute to wrongful convictions. Through a series of meticulously detailed case studies, the authors reveal the ways in which procedural errors, investigative failures, and institutional complacency undermine the integrity of justice. Grisham’s examination of Cameron Todd Willingham’s case, for instance, highlights the devastating consequences of relying on discredited forensic methods. Investigators drew conclusions about arson based on outdated techniques, reflecting a broader failure of the system to prioritize scientific accuracy over convenience. Similarly, McCloskey’s narrative of Linda Jo Edwards’s case underscores the dangers of tunnel vision, where law enforcement’s preoccupation with a single suspect led to the disregard of contradictory evidence and the fabrication of critical details. These accounts illustrate a justice system that often prioritizes expedience over a genuine pursuit of truth, with devastating outcomes for the accused.

The authors further expose the complicity of prosecutors and the judiciary in perpetuating these injustices. Prosecutors frequently suppress exculpatory evidence, as seen in the manipulation of Johnny Webb’s testimony in Willingham’s trial, where incentives created unreliable accounts that the state chose to accept uncritically. Meanwhile, courts repeatedly fail in their role as safeguards against miscarriages of justice, upholding convictions despite glaring evidentiary flaws.